Poodles are small in size and suitable for big cities. A small part of people who raise black poodles have really been provoked by poodles, and a large part of them have never had much contact with poodles and just follow the trend of black poodles, just like black Virgos.
It is undeniable that many poodles will have sex, but as a pet dog, poodles basically have no other disadvantages. Poodles are small in size and suitable for big cities. They do not need a large activity space like large and medium-sized dogs; poodles basically have no body odor, and they are even fragrant after taking a bath once a week; poodles rarely shed hair, and only shed hair when combing, so they are easy to clean; poodles have high IQs and are well trained. Small dogs only need to learn to urinate at a fixed point, not to pounce or bark when seeing people, and they are good dogs. Moreover, after four or five trainings, they can understand simple commands such as “sit down”, which is very worry-free.
Besides, my poodle was neutered at seven months old, and after neutering, he never had sex again, yes, not once (this may depend on luck). Now it eats a handful of dog food every day, takes a bath once a week (two weeks in winter), and has its hair cut once a month. It does not shed hair or drool. It does not smell when you pet it. It is very clean and has enough activities at home, so it does not destroy the house. And because of its small size, it is very convenient to educate. If it barks at the owner, just pick it up and slap it twice and it will be obedient. It will not let go.
As an owner, I am very satisfied to pet a cute, clean and smart dog every day. So no matter how it is criticized online, what does it have to do with me? I am so happy raising it, so why should I care whether you are exaggerating or criticizing it? I hope you don’t raise poodles, just me. Scarcity makes things valuable, and I am happy alone.
The main point of the question is to understand that those people on the Internet who point fingers at your dog will not listen to you even if you explain to your dog that it never barks or something, because they just want to vent their anger. Your dog didn’t provoke them, but they, as humans, rushed to hate the dog. It shows that they have been bullied a lot in their daily lives. They dare not confront people head-on, and can only curse the dog across the Internet. It’s quite sad to say.
Please read the description of the question before reading my answer. The questioner’s situation is that his dog has no grudge against those people, and those people know nothing about his dog. They just said that the dog was bad under the photo posted by the questioner. What did the questioner do wrong? Did the questioner owe them or did the dog owe them? If
you want to complain about the dog, fine, no problem, you can scold it anywhere, but a well-mannered person will not scold it under the photo of a dog that has no grudge against him. Are you scolding the dog? You are provoking! The dog you met was indeed disgusting, but the questioner’s dog didn’t provoke you, so what are you implying by telling the questioner this specifically? Do you really think people are blind and can’t see it?
It’s like you complain about naughty children, fine, no problem, but if a strange couple posts a picture of their children, you go up and say how disgusting the child is, and how disgusting the naughty child you met is, do you really think this is right?
I don’t think my answer is to defend those uncultured dog owners. I think there should be basic respect between people, and you shouldn’t criticize others without understanding them. Is it difficult to comment on other people’s private property? In real life, would you point at and curse at someone who has a poodle and the poodle did nothing, and tell the owner how disgusting the poodle you met before was? Why are these uncivilized things considered normal after they are covered with the cloak of the Internet?
I wonder if Zhihu has come up with a “problem description” function, isn’t it just for show? Before answering the question, can you take a look at the description of the question? The poster did nothing wrong, does he deserve to be ridiculed just because he has a poodle? I am
not closing the comments to target anyone, I really didn’t expect the poster to encounter such a thing, and there are so many answers with various hints to defend those people. I think this kind of “as long as a certain type of thing has a bad reputation, it can be taken for granted and regardless of individual differences, just go up to a stranger and curse it” is really terrifying. How much hostility does it take to do such a thing? Anyway, I have explained what I should explain, there is nothing more to discuss.
Leave a Reply